Junto

If you want something done right do it yourself

Friday April 24th, in the year of our lord 2009

With perfect weather and a number of new faces in the crowd we gathered to discuss art discourse in Philadelphia. Rather, the current lack-thereof. There was plenty of frustration voiced regarding this critical desert, and yet we are ripe for an oasis.

junto-art-criticism-panel

Our expert panel included Andrew Suggs, director of the non-profit artist-run Vox Populi Gallery, Sid Sachs, director of the Rosenwald-Wolf Gallery and faculty at the University of the Arts, Libby Rosof and Roberta Fallon, founders of the Philadelphia Art Blog and the 0.1% For Art Commission, and was led by myself and Katie Murken, artist and Tyler faculty member.

A bit of background was discussed, from Richard Flood’s 1970’s publication Arts Exchange, the New Arts Examiner magazine, the cratering of the art market in the early 90’s, the start of Vox Populi (they are currently in their twenty-first year), the start of Space 1026 (eleven years ago), and the start of the Art Blog as a means of digesting through reviews a small part of the Philadelphia community.

The impetus for this Junto was my assumption that there is little being done—in Philadelphia and the larger art world—in the way of framing contemporary art practice with theory (or as Sid put it, philosophy). Sid further clarified that the distribution of criticism is a bell curve: pedestrian taste-oriented chatter on the left tail, a bulk of informed reviews generating exposure for work, and the academic right of art philosophy. It is not that we are lacking any one of those functions of criticism, but we need for all of them to expand and elevate. Artists and galleries need reviews for exposure, the audience needs reviews to help them find their way through a large and disparate art world. Artists and galleries also need the help of theorists to place their work in a larger context, providing a vocabulary for discussion, and challenging them to make work that is increasingly relevant.

There are currently a number of avenues for each of those critical functions—Libby and Roberta keep a somewhat comprehensive list of local and national art blogs on their site, Andrew and Vox continue to invite critics and curators to lead artist talks for each exhibition and have recently embraced a forum for group critique between members. Sid challenged us to fill in the gaps. There is a feeling that Philadelphia lacks the monetary base to sustain serious criticism, but what it does have is cheap rent and plenty of democratized technology. The circumstances that make our city ripe for the creation of art extend equally to criticism.

After this opportunity to blow off some steam and have sort of a group-hug, it seems there is a fervor and want for elevated conversation, and plenty of qualified practitioners. Start writing a book, start contributing to a blog, record artist talks, publish or perish.

One Response to “If you want something done right do it yourself”

  1. eagleapex Says:

    One of the big rhetorical questions for me was “Do you need a budget to write serious art criticism?” I think the crowd answered that you don’t need a budget if you have enough passion.

Leave a Reply

OUR DEAR AND HONORED FRIENDS,

We have form'd most of our ingenious acquaintance into a club of mutual improvement, which we call the Junto; we meet on Thursday evenings, by the lunar cycle. The rules we have drawn require that every member, in his turn, should produce one or more queries on any point of Morals, Politics, or Web Applications, to be discuss'd by the company; and once in three months produce and read a presentation of his own creation, on any subject of technology he please.

Do you love truth for truth's sake, and will you endeavor impartially to find and receive it yourself, and communicate it to others?